A Strategy for Managing Apathetic Users During Requirements Definition

Grace Osaretinmwen Aziken, Francisca Egbokhare

Abstract


Requirement elicitation is the most important software development activity that determines the success of a software development project, and the quality of a software product is highly dependent on the correctness, completeness and conciseness of the outcome of this phase. Users play a key role in this process and the associated outcome which makes it imperative to involve them throughout this phase. Different categories of users were identified during a requirements elicitation activity, as input from all the groups was required to gather adequate requirements that was representative of the users’ needs. There is the risk of poor requirements gathering if any category of users shows apathy or lack of interest in expressing their needs regarding a software product. Participants for this study was derived using purposive sampling. A qualitative approach was adopted, comprising a semi-structured interview with key informants, after an informal interactive session with them to educate and acquaint them with their significant role in the success of the project. This paper reports the risk management strategy adopted in the management of these apathetic users during requirements definition process to ensure they made the needed contribution and elicited their needs. This intervention helped to obtain requirements from all categories of users of the intended software product. The resulting software product was well accepted and used by all because their needs were captured and incorporated in its development.


Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Bano, D. Zowghi and F. da Raimini. “User satisfaction and system success:an empirical exploration of user involvement in software development.”, Empirical Software Engineering. 22(5). 2339 - 2372, 2017

N. Saif, M. Almohawes and N. Jmail. “The impact of user involvement in software development process”. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 21(1). 354-359, 2021

Abolalayee. “How to have motivated and love working employees”. Tehran: Industrial Management Organization. 2015

A.Rezaeian. “Waiting for justice and righteousness in organization”. Tehran: SAMT. 2014

Schmidt, J. . “Mitigating risk of failure in information technology projects: Causes and mechanisms”. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100097. 2023

K. Irfandhi. “Risk Management in Information Technology Project: An empirical study”. COMTECH: Computer, Mathematics And Engineering Applications. BINUS Journal Publishing. 7(3), 191-199. 2016

K. M. Whitney and C. B. Daniels. “The root cause of failure in complex IT projects: Complexity itself.”. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 325-330. 2013 doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.280.

K. Ewusi-Mensah. Software development failures, MIT Press, Cambridge. 2003

Anwar and R. Razal. “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Stakeholders Selection Model for Software Requirements Elicitation. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 13 (6), 726 - 738, 2016

L. C. Ronoh, G. M. Muchiri and F. Wabwoba. “Factors Affecting Requirements Elicitation for Heterogeneous Users of Information Systems”. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Technology( IJCSET) Vol 5, Issue 3,35-39, 2015

A. Hussain, E. O. C. Mkpojiogu and F. M. Kamal. “The Role of Requirements in the Success or Failure of Software Projects”. International Review of Management and marketing, 6(S7) 306-311, 2016

M. Glinz and R. Wieringa. “Stakeholders in requirements engineering”. IEEE Softw 24(2):18–20, 2007

C. Pacheco and E. Tovar. “Stakeholder identification as an issue in the improvement of software requirements quality”. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Springer, Trondheim, Norway, 370 - 380, 2007

G. Casalea, C. Chestaa, P. Deussena, E. Di Nitto a, P. Gouvasa, S. Koussourisa,V.Stankovskia, A. Symeonidisa, V. Vlassioua, A. Zafeiropoulosa, and Z. Zhao.. “Current and Future Challenges of Software Engineering for Services and Applications”. Procedia Computer Science 97, 34 – 42, 2016

F. Anwar and R. Razali, R. “A Practical Guide to Requirements Elicitation Techniques Selection - An Empirical Study”. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 11 (8): 1056–67., 2012

J. S. C. Hsu, T.C. Lin, G.T. Zheng and Y.W. Hung,. “Users as knowledge co-producers in the information system development project”. Int. J. Project Manage., 30: 27-36, 2012

N. Achim and A. Kassim. “Computer Usage: The Impact of Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-efficacy”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (172) 701 – 708, 2015

J. E. Priyatma. “Analysis of the Factors that Influence the Use of the Learning Management System: An Empirical Study in Indonesia During Pandemic COVID-19 Period”. United International Journal for Research & Technology 3(5). 37 - 45, 2022

Jalagat and Al-Habsi,. “Evaluating the Impacts of IT Usage on Organizational Performance”. European Academic Research 5(9): 5111-5164, 2017

S. F. A.Aziz, F.W. Halim, R. H. Mohd, M. N. Selamat, N. H. Omar,A. Ibrahim and M.Y. Derasol. “Nurturing Organizational Characteristics to Maximize Training Impact on Teamwork Effectiveness: The Malaysian Sample”. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Managment and Sciences, 10(1), 223-243., 2021

G. O. Aziken and F. A. Egbokhare . “A study on the Importance of User Profiling during Software Requirements Elicitation” . Nigeria Journal of Education, Health and Technology Research (NJEHETR). 10. 29-35, 2018

A. Holloman, B. Y. Hernandez-Cuevas, S. Thomas, K. Swain and C. S. Crawford. . “A Systematic Literature Review of Paper Prototyping” . In Woodstock ’18: ACM Symposium on Neural Gaze Detection, Woodstock, NY . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1- 17 2018 https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1122445.1122456

N. Broy, V. Lindner and F. Alt. “The S3D-UI designer - Creating user interface prototypes for 3D displays”. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA, 49–55. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012727

J. O. Choi, J. Forlizzi, M. Christel, R. Moeller, M. Bates and J. Hammer..”Playtesting with a purpose”. In CHI PLAY 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, New York, USA, 254–265, 2016, https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2967934.2968103

I. Fronza, N. ElIoini and L. Corral. “Teaching software design engineering across the K-12 curriculum: Using visual thinking and computational thinking”. In SIGITE 2016 - Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, New York, USA, 97–101, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1145/2978192.2978220

A. Fuchs, M. Sturdee and J. Schöning. “FoldWatch: Using origami-inspired paper prototypes to explore the extension of output space in smartwatches”. In ACM International conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA , 47–59, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240173

A. K. Grant, J. K., Felner, Y., Castañeda, P. Pratap, and J. Hebert-Beirne,.. ”Leveraging Key Informant Interviews to Inform Intervention Development”: The Greater Lawndale Healthy Work Project. Community Health Equity Research & Policy, 44(4), 429–438, 2024

Kumar, Ankit and Sharma, Astha. "Observation Method: A Review Study" . Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 7820. 2023

Kang, B., Crilly, N., Ning,W., Kristensson, P. O.. “Prototyping to elicit user requirements for product development: Using head-mounted augmented reality when designing interactive devices”, Design Studies, Volume 84, 2023

G. Sim, B. Cassidy and J. Read . “Understanding the fidelity effect when evaluating games with children”. In: the Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM New York, NY, USA, pp. 193–200. 2003

M. Mukherjee, R. Ramirez, and R. Cuthbertson.. “Strategic reframing as a multi-level process enabled with scenario research”. Long Range Planning, 53(5), 101933. 2020

F. Yu,and B. Enste. “Smart prototyping”. In J. Chen, A. Brem, E. Viardot, and P. K. Wong (Eds.), The routledge companion to innovation management: The strategic perspective of innovation (pp. 237– 267). Routledge. 2019 https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315276670

G. O. Aziken and F. A. Egbokhare.. “Resolving the User-Developer Requirements Elicitation Conflict using a psychological Lens”. Computing, Information Systems, Development Informatics & Allied Research Journal, Ghana. Vol. 8 No. 1, pg 15 – 20 www.cisdijournal.net, 2017

E. Apergis. “Who is tech savvy? Exploring the adoption of smartphones and tablets: An empirical investigation”, The

Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 30, Iss. 2. 2019

O. E. Hatlevik and V. Bjarnø. “Examining the relationship between resilience to digital distractions , ICT self-efficacy , motivation , approaches to studying and time spent on individual studies”. Teach. Teach. Educ., 102., 103326. 2021

M. Kane and W. M. K. Trochim. “Concept mapping for planning and evaluation”. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2007

C. Lee, A. S. Yeung, and K. W. Cheung. “Learner perceptions versus technology usage: a study of adolescent English learners in Hong Kong secondary schools”, Comput. Educ., 133., 13-26. 2019

A. Rohatgi, R. Scherer and O. E. Hatlevik. “The role of ICT self-efficacy for students ’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test”, Comput. Educ., 102., 103-116. 2016

E. Abolfazli, R. Y. Saidabadi and V. Fallah. “An analytical study on indifference management in Educational System of Iran: Reflection on Expert’s opinions”,. Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship International Review. (1-2). 22. 2016


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Control and Computer Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.